Reviews - Monsters, Inc. (2001)
100 | Robert Wilonsky |
As giddy and antic as any great Warner Bros. cartoon of the 1930s and '40s -- it bears seeing more than once, if only to allow for the sight gags that play second fiddle to the plot, a rarity in animation -- but also resonant and real. In other words, it's the perfect movie. |
Read More: New Times (L.A.) |
100 | Peter Travers |
It's the Pixar animators who keep grown-ups as riveted as the kids with visual marvels that dazzle and delight. |
Read More: Rolling Stone |
100 | Hazel-Dawn Dumpert |
The story's charming, the set pieces are wildly inventive, and even the throwaway one-liners, about everything from movie-animation pioneer Ray Harryhausen to the old Oscar Meyer jingle, are hilarious. |
Read More: L.A. Weekly |
90 |
A terrific piece of work: smart, inventive and executed with state-of-the-art finesse. |
|
90 | A.O. Scott |
There hasn't been a film in years to use creative energy as efficiently as Monsters, Inc. |
Read More: The New York Times |
88 | Lawrence Toppman |
It comes from Pixar, the animation studio that scored with the "Toy Story" series and "A Bug's Life," and it has more zip and a tad less soul than those predecessors. |
Read More: Charlotte Observer |
88 | Mark Caro |
The climax, featuring what's essentially a suspended roller coaster of closet doors, is as thrilling as it is imaginative. |
Read More: Chicago Tribune |
88 | Rene Rodriguez |
Movies like Monsters, Inc. literally make you feel like a kid again, marveling at the joyously inventive sights before you, and that's a feat that should not be taken lightly. |
Read More: Miami Herald |
88 | Carrie Rickey |
"Shrek" is a scintilla funnier, "Toy Story 2" a hair's breadth more poignant, but "MI" is every bit as imaginative and lovable as these other contemporary animation classics. |
Read More: Philadelphia Inquirer |
88 | Lou Lumenick |
Smart, funny and ingeniously detailed with terrific vocal teamwork. |
Read More: New York Post |
88 | Mike Clark |
Though the comedy is sometimes more frenetic than inspired and viewer emotions are rarely touched to any notable degree, the movie is as visually inventive as its Pixar predecessors. |
Read More: USA Today |
83 | William Arnold |
Not quite up to the exalted level of the two predecessors ("Toy Story" and "Toy Story 2"), be assured it's still the most eye-popping and thoroughly entertaining animated film to come down the pike so far this year. |
Read More: Seattle Post-Intelligencer |
80 | Michael Dequina |
Confirms that despite all the technical tools at their disposal, one thing counts head and shoulders above razzle-dazzle eye candy (or anything else, for that matter): the story and characters, and Monsters, Inc. introduces worthy additions to the Pixar pantheon. |
Read More: Film Threat |
80 | Peter Rainer |
Much more kid-oriented than any other computer-animated movie thus far. In other words, it's much more Disneyish. I enjoyed it. |
Read More: New York Magazine (Vulture) |
80 | Lisa Alspector |
An unprecedented friendship between a monster and a child leads to an amazing chase scene. |
Read More: Chicago Reader |
78 | Marc Savlov |
The spirited interplay between Goodman and Crystal is both wacky and, dare I say, charming. |
Read More: Austin Chronicle |
75 | David Sterritt |
The movie's cutest twist is that the monsters are more scared of kids than kids are of them, because they think human children are toxic. |
Read More: Christian Science Monitor |
75 | Carla Meyer |
Funny and sweet enough to delight kids and inventive enough to satisfy adults. |
Read More: San Francisco Chronicle |
75 | Lisa Schwarzbaum |
Monsters, Inc. has got that swing, that zippity, multilevel awareness of kids'-eye sensibilities and adult-pitched humor. |
Read More: Entertainment Weekly |
75 | Roger Ebert |
Monsters, Inc. is cheerful, high-energy fun, and like the other Pixar movies, has a running supply of gags and references aimed at grownups. |
Read More: Chicago Sun-Times |
70 | Charles Taylor |
It's a nice movie. But Disney has never learned that "nice," especially in comedy, is a negative virtue. |
Read More: Salon.com |
70 | Todd McCarthy |
Clever and jokey in a vaudeville sort of way, but lacks the heart and sheer imagination of the company's best work for Disney, "Toy Story 2" and "A Bug's Life." |
Read More: Variety |
70 | David Edelstein |
Doesn’t have the warmth of the Toy Story pictures, but it still boasts a very entertaining slapstick-farce structure and some neat hairy, oozy, tendrilly creatures. |
Read More: Slate |
60 | Kenneth Turan |
Though it has its charms, Monsters, Inc. does not measure up. As a childhood entertainment it is certainly fine, but Pixar's celebrated lure for adults is largely absent. |
Read More: Los Angeles Times |
60 | Frank Lovece |
The funny lines fall flat and the relationships and conversations among adult characters are straight out of 1950s sitcoms. Now that's scary. |
Read More: TV Guide Magazine |
50 | Michael Atkinson |
But Monsters, Inc. -- directed by Pixar soldier Pete Docter, not by master digital comic John Lasseter -- turns out to be stingy on context, commentary, and the prism-ing view of pop culture that made the earlier films mint. |
Read More: Village Voice |